if you haven’t been following along (or even if you have), you may not know that one of the little mysteries here on the blog has been why did the franks abandon cousin marriage in the 800s? in the 700s, they’d still been marrying cousins, but [from here]:
“By the ninth century, a marriage in the third *generatio* [i.e. second cousins – h.chick] had become scandalous…. [T]here was no lack of ‘honest and God-fearing people’ willing to report on their neighbours, being quite able to identify illegitimate marriages when it suited them. Apparently the public scandal of incest could shake whole communities — which suggests that abhorrence of this crime was not merely a matter of the clergy and some pious aristocrats.”
well, i think i’ve discovered what happened — the establishment and promotion of parishes and parish churches in every town and village, thanks to pepin the short and charlemagne. from The Development of the Parochial System: From Charlamagne (768-814) to Urban II (1088-1099) [pgs. 3-4]:
“A modern French historian has pointed out that every ecclesiastical institution in the end seems to lead back to Charlemagne. This is particularly true of the parish church in the modern sense of the phrase. The reign of Charlemagne (768-814) saw the beginnings of a movement for the establishment of a church and priest in every village. Such a church…very soon became the church to which the inhabitants of the village looked for all the day to day administrations of the Christian religion. It was their parish church. The movement continued for the next three hundred years. By the reign of Uban II (1088-1099), the pope who first began to apply the reforming principles of Gregory VII (1073-1085) to parish churches, each diocese north of the Alps was well on the way to being organised on the basis of the parochial system in the generally accepted sense of the term, that is a system of pastoral care exercised through numerous small urban and rural units, each with its church, its endowment and its priest. In the northern half of Italy however the country areas of dioceses continued down to comparatively modern times to be organised round the country churches of the older type (such a church being called a *plebs* or *pieve*), each with a number of dependent chapels. The division into smaller units came later in the cities than in the country. Only in the eleventh century did city area begin to be broken into parises, one of the first being Worms, which in 1016 was divided up into four parishes by the great bishop and canonist, Burchard of Worms. Up till then cities were still organised as one unit as in Roman and Merovingian times; the pastoral work being carried on from the cathedral, assisted by other churches, usually collegiate, none of them responsible for a particular area in the city. With the movement for the establishment of the parochial system in the years between Charlemagne and Urban II, first on the continent, then in England, this paper is concerned….
“At the time of the Council of Mainz (847) it has been caculated that in what now very roughly corresponds to the Federal Republic of Western Germany there were some three thousand five hundred churches.
“This spectacular increase in the number of country churches witnessed to the christianisation of barbarian society. But it was encouraged by those sections of Charlemagne’s legislation, which emphasised the importance of every Christian having frequent opportunities for worship and for instruction in Christian conduct. A church and priest in every village was a necessity if the emperor’s ideal was to be realised….
“The building of churches was assisted by a new form of property which the church acquired in the eighth century, namely tithe. The idea of tithe was not new. Previous to the eighth century the faithful had frequently been exhorted to give a tenth of their income to the Church. But it was a voluntary gift and could be made to any church they chose. In a circular letter to the bishops in 765, Pepin the Short, the father of Charlemagne, made the payment of tithe obligatory throughout his dominions…. Every person had to pay a tenth of the produce of his land or of his profits in trade or commerce, at first it would seem to the bishop of the diocese. But very soon the payment was transferred to the church where the person heard mass and his children were baptised.”
with “frequent opportunities for worship and for instruction in Christian conduct,” the franks (carolingians) of the 800s could’ve been — were probably — very well-informed on the church’s policies on incest. enforcement by the church authorities may also have increased, although a church wedding was still not mandatory at this point in time (not until the 1200s, in fact).
btw, i can’t actually take any credit for discovering this info. it was more that i stumbled upon it. =P here i need to thank the derb for indirectly helping me out — he’s always recommending The Great Courses audio lecture series, and, following his recommendations, the d.h. and i have been listening to some of them. it was in the Early Middle Ages series that i learned about the establishment of parishes by pepin. so, thanks john! (^_^) (they ARE really good series, btw!)
previously: mating patterns of the medieval franks
(note: comments do not require an email. pepin le bref.)
hbd chick 
[…] random note: 03/09/15 […]
I’m curious. How do you find these books that contain the relevent information? Have you considered making a list of them with a brief summary of what each contains? (I know, it would be even more work, but it might get a few others going on the same topic).
@frau katze – “How do you find these books that contain the relevent information?”
well, in this case i already knew the relevant piece of information from The Great Courses lecture, i.e. that pepin the short had ordered parishes to be established, i just wanted to confirm it with another source. so i just checked on google books for “pepin the short + parishes.” came up with a handful of results — this was one of them. (^_^)
@frau katze – “Have you considered making a list of them with a brief summary of what each contains?”
aaahhh. an annotated bibliography! now there’s a thought. maybe after i clone myself. (~_^) srsly, that is a good idea! (^_^)
[…] Source: HBD Chick […]
Let me add to your reading list: Peter Heather “The Restoration of Rome” subtitled “Barbarian Popes & Imperial Pretenders”. Chapters 7 and 8 illuminate this stuff. Splendid book.
Chick,
Do you know of any Church dogma that specifically discusses political pacification via banning cousin marriage?
Jay — http://www.jayhanson.us/
@dearieme – “Let me add to your reading list: Peter Heather ‘The Restoration of Rome’ subtitled ‘Barbarian Popes & Imperial Pretenders’. Chapters 7 and 8 illuminate this stuff. Splendid book.”
brilliant! thanks. (^_^)
@jay – “Do you know of any Church dogma that specifically discusses political pacification via banning cousin marriage?”
not specifically political pacification — not that i know of. there was definitely talk about social pacification, mostly notably from st. augustine of hippo and st. thomas aquinas (who was largely echoing augustine, although he had his own thoughts on the matter, too).
here’s st. augustine on outbreeding:
“After the first marriage of the man made from the dust and his wife, created from the man’s side, the human race had need of the union of males and females in order to multiply itself by begetting offspring. But there were then no other human beings apart from those who had been born of the first two. Therefore, men took their sisters as wives. In ancient times, this was acceptable, because done under the compulsion of necessity; now, however, it is damnable because forbidden by religion. For affection is now given its proper place, so that men, for whom it is beneficial to live together in honourable concord, may be joined to one another by the bonds of diverse relationships: not that one man should combine many relationships in his sole person, but that those relationships should be distributed among individuals, and should thereby bind social life more effectively by involving a greater number of persons in them.“
and thomas aquinas on the importance of outbreeding:
“The third reason is that incest would prevent people widening their circle of friends. When a man takes a wife from another family he is joined in special friendship with her relations; they are to him as his own. And so Augustine writes, ‘The demands of charity are fulfilled by people coming together in the bonds that the various ties of friendship require, so that they may live together in a profitable and becoming amity; nor should one man have many relationships restricted to one other, but each single should go to many singly.'”
but, also, aquinas appears to have been concerned about the social effects of too much outbreeding:
“[T]owards these latter times the prohibition of the Church has been restricted to the fourth degree, because it became useless and dangerous to extend the prohibition to more remote degrees of consanguinity. Useless, because charity waxed cold in many hearts so that they had scarcely a greater bond of friendship with their more remote kindred than with strangers: and it was dangerous because through the prevalence of concupiscence and neglect men took no account of so numerous a kindred, and thus the prohibition of the more remote degrees became for many a snare leading to damnation.”
(i.e. on that last point of aquinas’: you might *accidentally* marry a distant cousin, not realizing they were your distant cousin, and so damn yourself to hell. yikes!)
Thanks Chick for your excellent research!
Keep up the good work,
Jay
[…] blogger HBD Chick (not a Christian, for whatever it’s worth) has often argued (e.g., here and here) that the church in Europe is what convinced everyone to stop marrying their cousins, and that […]