open psych

in case you haven’t seen them already, make sure to check out these (fairly) newly established open access, open peer review psychology journals: Open Differential Psychology and Open Behavioral Genetics! discussion forum here.

the masterminds behind this project are that rebellious viking emil kirkegaard (no relation — see also here and on twitter) and poet(!) davide piffer.

see this current submission, for instance, from our very own peter frost!: “Negotiating the gap. Four academics and the dilemma of human biodiversity.” (~_^)

as that old danish expression goes: nye koste feje bedst!

thank you, gentlemen! (^_^)

Advertisements

6 Comments

  1. Piffer criticizing Dawkins for ignoring evidence on psychic phenomena in the post you linked.

    worry?

    Reply

  2. @ckp – “Piffer criticizing Dawkins for ignoring evidence on psychic phenomena in the post you linked. worry?”

    the science ought to stand — or fall — on its own, afaiac.

    they’re open access journals, so you’ll be able to judge for yourself! (^_^)

    Reply

  3. I did not “criticize Dawkins for ignoring evidence on psychic phenomena”. I criticized him for IGNORING EVIDENCE. Full stop! Ignoring evidence is not a scientific attitude and is intellectual dishonesty, whether it’s ignoring psychic phenomena or hard, mainstream facts.I cannot believe you think I should approve of fundamentalism, because science needs to deal with facts and not preconceived opinions.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s