Brown-skinned, blue-eyed, Y-haplogroup C-bearing European hunter-gatherer from Spain (Olalde et al. 2014) – @dienekes’. – also: European Hunter-Gatherers, Blue Eyes and Dark Skin? – from razib. – also: Hunter-gatherer European had blue eyes and dark skin – “Genetic tests reveal that a hunter-gatherer who lived 7,000 years ago had the unusual combination of dark skin and hair and blue eyes.” – h/t ed west! – also: Tar-Zan* and Korak and Shades of Pale from greg cochran.
Y-chromosome “Adam” was not necessarily human – “From the point of view of population genetics, there is absolutely no reason that the common ancestor of all human Y chromosomes must have existed in an individual that we would identify as ‘human’.”
Genomic variation in sharing between siblings – “Visscher et al make really nice use of this slight variability in how much of the genome sibs share to learn about how much variation in height within a population is due to genetic variation. They use the fact that sibs who share slightly more of their genome (>0.5) should have more similar heights, than sibs who share less of their genomes (<0.5). This allows them to partition out how much of the resemblance between siblings is due to a shared environment, as opposed to shared genomes…. It also makes me wonder if sibs are actually unconsciously, weakly aware of these subtle genomic differences (through their similarity in a range of traits, including height etc). I could imagine doing a study where siblings (or others) are asked to assess how similar they are/feel, and then assessing whether this is weakly correlated with the fraction of the genome shared. I keep meaning to followup on this idea with some popgen theory to assess how this might play out in modifying kin-selection and altruism between sibs and other relatives." – from graham coop [this guy].
New genes spring, spread from non-coding DNA – “A new study shows that new genes can spring from non-coding DNA more rapidly than expected.” – h/t hbd bibliography!
HBD Chick Lays it Down on HBD – “I say can’t we just stick to seeking out the truth, whatever that is….” – hear, hear! – from jayman.
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome – “[T]he gut microbiome can rapidly respond to altered diet, potentially facilitating the diversity of human dietary lifestyles.”
300,000-year-old hearth found: Microscopic evidence shows repeated fire use in one spot over time – “Scientists discovered in the Qesem Cave, an archaeological site near present-day Rosh Ha’ayin, the earliest evidence — dating to around 300,000 years ago — of unequivocal repeated fire building over a continuous period. These findings help answer the question and hint that those prehistoric humans already had a highly advanced social structure and intellectual capacity.” – h/t razib!
The new European phenotype: expansion into the Middle East – from peter frost.
Chimpocentrism and reconstructions of human evolution (a timely reminder) – h/t neuroskeptic! who said: “Beware ‘chimpocentrism’ in studies of human evolution.” – see also: Chimps have undergone more positive selection than humans – from adam benton.
Genius in the genes – from dr. james thompson.
On Dolphins, Big Brains, Shared Genes and Logical Leaps – “‘It looks like ASPM evolved adaptively in all mammals…. It could be that ASPM is a general target of selection in episodes of brain evolution and isn’t specific to large brains.'”
Rates of atheism/agnosticism by ethnicity – from the awesome epigone.
Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? – @the chateau.
Comparing Warfare Deaths per Capita in 18th vs. 20th Centuries – “[T]he 20th century was only a bit more violent than the 18th century.” – from mike anissimov.
Why is polygamy declining? – from matt ridley, who tweeted: “The decline of human polygamy coincides with democracy.”
The Dark Enlightenment Hits Stage Two
La ciencia estúpida – “La mayoría de los grandes científicos y filósofos no eran lo que diríamos tipos agradables. Tampoco eran políticamente correctos según el canon normal. Prácticamente ningún filósofo o científico anterior a la escuela de Frankfurt podría dar hoy una clase pública sin la amenaza de ser molestado por una turba emancipatoria. Hume, Darwin, Voltaire, Locke, Kant (no digamos ya Platón o Aristóteles) hoy no podrían ser contratados en la universidad de un país occidental.” – from eduardo zugasti.
Genome of longest-living cancer: 11,000-year-old living dog cancer reveals its origin, evolution – “A cancer normally lives and dies with a person, however this is not the case with a sexually transmitted cancer in dogs. In a new study, researchers have described the genome and evolution of this cancer that has continued living within the dog population for the past 11,000 years.”
Why the masculine face? Genetic evidence reveals drawbacks of hyper-masculine features – “[A]round half the variation in both male and female facial masculinity could be attributed to additive genetic variation…. The extensive genetic variation in masculinity makes more plausible the idea that choosing to mate with a masculine man can result in more attractive offspring. But the genes that made a male face more masculine did not make it more attractive. Worse, these same genes made female faces more masculine and thus less attractive. Families that make manly-looking sons tend also to make masculine-looking daughters.”
Casting Out The Devil – “[C]onservatives generally think that liberals are misguided, and live in deep denial of obvious truths about human nature and the way the world actually works (as opposed to the way they think it *ought* to work), liberals view conservatives not just as misguided, but as *morally evil*.” – from malcolm pollack.
Joshua Greene’s “Moral Tribes”: The Minting of a New Morality – from helian.
Bones from human sacrifice at Tenochtitlan ceremonial complex – “Fragments of human bones that exhibit cut marks and prolonged exposure to fire have been discovered through various excavations in the Sacred Precinct of Tenochtitlan (located in Mexico City). These skeletal remains are from individuals, such as children, slaves and captured warriors, who were sacrificed during religious festivals. – cannibalism! – h/t charles mann!
It’s not just ancient Roman propaganda: Carthaginians really did sacrifice children – “‘We like to think that we’re quite close to the ancient world, that they were really just like us – the truth is, I’m afraid, that they really weren’t.'”
Data Mining Proves Darwin’s Finches Weren’t Really His – h/t jason moore!
Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality – “Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality.” – h/t chuck ross!
Social status influences Democrats’ — but not Republicans’ — support for reducing inequality – “Low wealth Democrats supported legislation to reduce economic inequality significantly more than both high wealth Democrats and Republicans. ‘Whereas Republicans tended to sponsor legislation that supports economic inequality regardless of their wealth, wealth predicted sponsoring behavior for Democrats,” the researchers explained.’ Specifically, high wealth Democrats tended to sponsor fewer pieces of legislation that reduce economic inequality than did their lower wealth counterparts.”
Dark lands: the grim truth behind the ‘Scandinavian miracle’ – “Take the Danes, for instance. True, they claim to be the happiest people in the world, but why no mention of the fact they are second only to Iceland when it comes to consuming anti-depressants?” – h/t claire lehmann!
Islam’s Baby Problem – @28 sherman.
Life as a Nonviolent Psychopath – “Neuroscientist James Fallon discovered through his work that he has the brain of a psychopath, and subsequently learned a lot about the role of genes in personality and how his brain affects his life.” – this guy again. h/t ray sawhill!
A Sexual-Decision Flowchart That Makes Everything Simpler for Medieval Men – h/t jayman! (who’s prolly very glad he doesn’t live in the middle ages. (~_^) )
bonus: US Army considers replacing thousands of troops with robots – “The US Army is studying whether robots could take the place of thousands of soldiers”
bonus bonus: Scotland had a glacier up to 1700s, say scientists
(note: comments do not require an email. glen coe – glacial valley.)



“US Army considers replacing thousands of troops with robots”
Where did we see this movie?
Oh yeah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIVLDJ_hrB4
Thanks for the linkage!
Hypothesis: had you named your site “HBD Bitch” and put up a fake front of being a feminist trying to crash the patriarchal party of genetics and science but still provided the same content (basically wear a mask), the media would love you and not dare call you any 21stC bad names.
“Genetic evidence reveals drawbacks of hyper-masculine features” I’ve got a post brewing about this one. I’ve got a strong hunch that your degree of masculinity/femininity will have an influence on your preference towards maximizing the potential variance among your offspring. I.e.: that Hyper feminine women are more attracted to hyper masculine men where the less feminine women are more attracted to the more feminine Artsy guys so there is a balance of hormones.
Genius in the genes? Epigenetics?
I am descended from a long ine of Scots-Irish Tennessee hillbillies who were, um, not all that smart. Then I popped up, the first one to go to and graduate college. I once asked my mother what she ate when she was pregnant. She said we were so poor she ate more salmon in one year that most people eat in their lifetimes. I’ve often wondered about that, because our brains are mostly fat – all those Omegas in fish, for example.
I’m sure there were other things, but I have no idea what. I’m mystified.
By the way, she now hates salmon.
@Bob Wallace
salmon = iodine, children need it for brain development.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15734706
“Genetic evidence reveals drawbacks of hyper-masculine features”
If masculine features ~ testosterone in the womb
and
If testosterone in the womb ~ ability to punch dangerous stuff in the face
then in a more violent environment women who prefer more masculine looking men might have a reproductive advantage over women who preferred less masculine. in a more peaceful environment it might work the other way round.
this would provide a neat mechanism for adjusting to circumstance
Against “chimpocentrism”, hbd chick , what do you think of Danny Vendramini’s neanderthal predation theory?
“Genetic evidence reveals drawbacks of hyper-masculine features” I’ve got a post brewing about this one. I’ve got a strong hunch that your degree of masculinity/femininity will have an influence on your preference towards maximizing the potential variance among your offspring. I.e.: that Hyper feminine women are more attracted to hyper masculine men where the less feminine women are more attracted to the more feminine Artsy guys so there is a balance of hormones.”
Yes and on the(classical) liberal people the opposite happen, masculine women marry with afeminate men. Why do you think they are push the non-normative sexual agenda???
The people SHOULD read ”neuropolitics”
http://neuropolitics.org/Conservative-Left-Brain-Liberal-Right-Brain.htm
Liberals and conservatives are in fact two different socio-species.
Foreigners who’ve had much exposure to American children might sympathise with the Carthaginians.
Perfect piece of liberal logic here:
Part of the grim truth is that Sweden has astonishingly high rape-rates: see Catalogue of shame contains some surprising countries where rape is most prevalent. The Guardian doesn’t mention that. I wonder why not? The Wikipedia page says:
Immigration? But why would immigration by Muslims and blacks increase the rape-rate? And even if it does, it’s okay. After all, Sweden was one of the most bloodthirsty nations on earth for much of the last millennium.
@Amicus
It’s the same everywhere – partly due to mass immigration being so heavily weighted to young men – which is partly why South Africa is so terrible in this area as it’s still attracting huge numbers of disproportionately young male immigrants. Rape is the dirty secret behind “white flight” in the west that the media has been covering up for fifty years..
@jayman – “Where did we see this movie?”
(~_^)
@sobl – “Hypothesis: had you named your site ‘HBD Bitch’ and put up a fake front of being a feminist trying to crash the patriarchal party of genetics and science but still provided the same content (basically wear a mask), the media would love you and not dare call you any 21stC bad names.”
d*mn! why didn’t i think of that?! (~_^)
@sisyphean – “I.e.: that Hyper feminine women are more attracted to hyper masculine men where the less feminine women are more attracted to the more feminine Artsy guys so there is a balance of hormones.”
i think your hunch is right!
@bob – “I am descended from a long ine of Scots-Irish Tennessee hillbillies who were, um, not all that smart. Then I popped up, the first one to go to and graduate college.”
could be epigenetics. might not be. could be de novo mutations (your very own unique mutations!) or other changes to your dna — a rearrangement of parts of genes, for instance — or copy number variation, i.e. that you have different numbers of repeated segements in some of your genes. all of those could make a difference.
i saw a figure about this the other day (can’t remember where now, so i might be remembering wrong): most people have an iq within one standard deviation of the average of their parents’ iqs, but 2% have beyond that. i think. (do i have that right at all, does anyone know?)
@daybreaker – “what do you think of Danny Vendramini’s neanderthal predation theory?”
i dunno anything about danny vendramini’s neanderthal predation theory! huh. thanks!
http://whatwemaybe.org/txt/txt0000/Glad.John.2011b.Jewish_Eugenics.pdf
@bob & hbd chick:
“@bob – “I am descended from a long ine of Scots-Irish Tennessee hillbillies who were, um, not all that smart. Then I popped up, the first one to go to and graduate college.”
could be epigenetics. might not be. could be de novo mutations (your very own unique mutations!) or other changes to your dna — a rearrangement of parts of genes, for instance — or copy number variation, i.e. that you have different numbers of repeated segements in some of your genes. all of those could make a difference.”
Guys, here’s how you figure it out.
It’s certainly not epigenetics, that’s a pile of b*llsh*t.
De novo mutations happen, but such mutations have a large effect on IQ are rare.
Courtesy Steve Hsu:
The first step is to take the average of your parents IQs.
Then convert that to a z-score over the population mean (i.e., IQ 115 with mean IQ 100 = +1z).
The regression of 0.6z (i.e., 115 parental mean = 109 mean IQ for children). The probably distribution of children’s IQ will be normally distributed around that with a standard deviation of ~12.
Hence, if your regressed mean is 90 in a population with an average IQ of 95, your children have a 0.62% chance of having an IQ of 120 or greater (+2.5 standard deviations, with the help of this handy z-score calculator).
Now that, of course, is assuming you don’t know anything about the family. The mean the children will regress to is the family mean, which can be estimated from the average IQ of the grandparents. Your regressed mean may be higher or lower depending on this.
So yes, it’s not at all inexplicable to have an occasional sharp cookie come out of a dull family.
@jayman – “Hence, if your regressed mean is 90 in a population with an average IQ of 95, your children have a 0.62% chance of having an IQ of 120 or greater….”
yes, but why do those children who wind up with an iq of 120+ wind up with that?
(my parents’ average iq is prolly 100, and i’m at ca. 130 — but i still can’t do math (~_^) — so this is something i’m curious about. none of my grandparents could’ve had above average iqs — farmers and maids, the lot of them.)
@hubchik
fish diet?
did three of your grand-parents have lots of freckles and one of them less?
or as Jayman says, fluke
@grey – “did three of your grand-parents have lots of freckles and one of them less?”
an itinerant academic who happened to wander into the village one day? (~_^)
perhaps, but i don’t think so. everyone in the family really looks (and behaves) like each other: i look like my parents and behave like them (although more like my dad than my mom, but apparently i also look a lot like my maternal great-grandmother according to some old folks), and my parents are both like their parents, so i’m pretty sure everyone’s legitimate in the family.
an additional piece of anecdata: out of my 52 first-cousins (i have got a BIG kindred!), only three of us have college degrees, and eight actually didn’t even manage to finish high school (secondary school), so…i AM a fluke, i guess! (and so are my other two cousins.) i’m just really curious to understand how that happened! -??-
@hbd chick:
“an additional piece of anecdata: out of my 52 first-cousins (i have got a BIG kindred!), only three of us have college degrees, and eight actually didn’t even manage to finish high school (secondary school), so…i AM a fluke, i guess! (and so are my other two cousins.) i’m just really curious to understand how that happened!”
My wife can relate. She has 16 first cousins all told. Of those only she and one other have finished college.
@hbdchick
“an itinerant academic who happened to wander into the village one day?”
no, just thinking about iodine
@hbd chick:
“yes, but why do those children who wind up with an iq of 120+ wind up with that?”
Recombination. Every child gets a slightly different mix of genes from the parents. Those with IQs much higher (or lower) than their parents just were lucky to get an exceptional mix. The further away from the parents’ (regressed) mean, the less likely this is to happen.