…person who is really wrong about the gender imbalance issue in china and india.
“Much of the literature on sex selection has suggested that cultural patterns explain the phenomenon. But Hvistendahl lays the blame squarely on western governments and businesses that have exported technology and pro-abortion practices without considering the consequences. Amniocentesis and ultrasound scans have had largely positive applications in the west, where they have been used to detect foetal abnormalities. But exported to Asia and eastern Europe they have been intricately linked to an explosion of sex selection and a mushrooming of female abortions.
“Hvistendahl claims western governments actively promoted abortion and sex selection in the developing world, encouraging the liberalisation of abortion laws and subsidising sales of ultrasounds as a form of population control.
“‘It took millions of dollars in funding from US organisations for sex determination and abortion to catch on in the developing world,’ she writes.”
yes, yes — it was the evil westerners. again.
never mind that she’s totally wrong.
“Undoubtedly the best indication of the fiercely agnatic character of the Indian family is the existence of a virulent tradition of female infanticide, more marked in north India even than in China. Recent Indian censuses consistently reveal a striking imbalance between the sexes: and excess of males denotes a massacre of female babies. A special supplement to the 1971 census was devoted to the sex ratio which, while normal in south India, frequently falls below 9 women to 10 men in north India (8.8 in Uttar Pradesh, near Delhi). In one group of villages in the Kangra district (Punjab) where a census was held in 1855, there were among children aged 4 to 14 only 393 girls for 1,000 boys.“
1855. that’s just a few years before ultrasounds and amniocentesis tests were exported to the east by us evil westerners.
for a change, i’m in agreement with richard dawkins: Sex selection and the shortage of women: is science to blame?
(note: comments do not require an email. or … omg! fish can count up to three! huh?)